logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.03 2018가단36302
양수금(시효연장)
Text

1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C, to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant (Appointed Party) and Appointed D are each 8.

Reasons

1. According to the statements in Evidence A Nos. 1 and 2, the fact of the reason for the annexed claim is recognized. Meanwhile, the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on September 3, 2005. The facts that the designated parties and the designated parties inherited the deceased’s property, and the Defendant’s designated parties and the designated parties received the adjudication to accept the qualified acceptance report under the Daegu Family Court Decision 2018Radan10793 on January 22, 2019 (negative property of the deceased on a property list is the obligation for the cause of the claim) shall be recognized by each statement in Evidence Nos. 1 through 5.

2. The Defendant’s designated parties asserted qualified acceptance, and the Plaintiff also changed the purport and cause of the claim by reflecting the fact of qualified acceptance, the above assertion by the Defendant’s designated parties is with merit.

3. If so, the Defendant Appointed and the designated parties are liable to pay the Plaintiff the assignee’s debt inherited from the deceased to the extent of the property inherited from the deceased C.

The plaintiff's claim shall be accepted with due reason.

arrow