The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, probation, community service order, 160 hours, 40 hours required to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture, and employment restriction order for children and juveniles-related institutions and welfare facilities for the disabled, each three years) is too uneasy and unreasonable;

2. Each of the crimes of this case committed by the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, by boarding and leaving the strabba, and by black the object of the crime.

In light of the background and method of the crime, the frequency of the crime, and the degree and degree of the indecent act, etc., it is difficult to find young female victims who walk alone on the new wall, and find them with a considerable distance, and find them flick or flicking the chest.

The victims are deemed to have caused fears and considerable sexual humiliation or displeasure due to the crime of this case, and the victims have not made any effort to agree with the victims, and the victims have not received any instruction from the victims, etc. are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in full view of the Defendant’s confession and reflect on the instant crime, the primary offender who has no criminal record, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment and other sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.