1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around January 12, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to purchase 55 million won (hereinafter “instant contract”) the “ordinary share certificates within the district of Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul” (hereinafter “instant contract”) and paid 55 million won for the same day.

The terms and conditions of the instant contract are as follows.

1) The contract is a sale and purchase of the right to occupy commercial buildings in the urban development district of Gangseo-day. 2) This right may be sold in lots in five square meters for commercial land.

3) The seller shall actively endeavor to have this right engaged in the same conduct as that of other right holders in the district of Gangwon-do. (b) The GH Corporation granted the right to purchase commercial land shares (16.5m2) to the compensationer in the district of Gangdong-gu Urban Development Project, Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, and the compensationer in livelihood measure cannot apply for the commercial land supply individually and applied for the supply of commercial land in the name of the association. (c) The Defendant is a compensationer who is entitled to receive commercial land shares in the above project district, and entered into a contract with the Defendant’s wife D around 2007 after entering into the contract of this case, to purchase commercial land shares in KRW 20 million from E’s heir C, the same person who is the compensationer in living measures, in the same manner as the other right holder. (d) The KH Corporation failed to provide the Defendant with information several times to file an application for the commercial land supply through membership in the association, and the Plaintiff did not enter into the agreement with the Defendant around 21,2015.