A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

On March 20, 2013, the Defendant, on March 20, 2013, administered approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection machine and administered them by inserting approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs in a way of injecting the psychotropic drugs into the left blood line.

Highest 2013 highest 4125

1. On July 12, 2013, at around 20:00, the Defendant put about approximately 0.03g of philopon at the home of the Defendant D in a single-use injection machine, dilutiond with raw water, and administered it in a way of injecting the left part of blood.

2. On July 13, 2013, at around 20:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 g of philopon into a single-use injection machine, dilution with natural water, and administering it in a way of injecting it into the left bloodline.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on requests for appraisal, and report on the results of the preliminary test for narcotics;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the results of a request for appraisal with a country for appraisal, collection charges, results of simple reagents examination, appending a report on the results of appraisal with a country and a water examination, conducting an investigation into the market price of a mert cancer and calculating

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. is that even though the Defendant had been requested for detention warrant after the commission of the crime on May 20, 2013, the crime is considerably poor, such as committing the same crime throughout the same period of time on July 12, 2013 and on December 13, 2013; however, it is being treated as an unidentified mental disorder.