logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.12.18 2018누67741
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following addition to the text of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In Part 4, Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following is added (the plaintiff has an unequal element based on Sharia, Islamic Sari, Islamic Sa, and there is a substantial gap in the gender of Algeria, and in particular, physical violence by family by a family is difficult to escape from unfair abuse of family members due to a request to a judicial authority (Evidence 14, Evidence 15-1, Evidence 15-2, and Evidence 16). However, even if Algeria's de facto discrimination against female is serious domestically, it is difficult to view that it is impossible to resolve such a problem as a situation where it is impossible to resolve it through a request, etc. from a judicial authority of Algeria, unless it is naturally permitted by Algeria law or Islamica, etc., such as the plaintiff's assertion.)

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow