logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.08.21 2015고단698
보조금관리에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A and F shall be sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment, 4 months of imprisonment for Defendant C, 2 months of imprisonment for Defendant E and Defendant B limited partnership company.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

With respect to the business of introducing low-floor buses using low-pollution fuel compared to ordinary buses, Jeollabuk-do is a subsidized business operator who receives subsidies from the State pursuant to Articles 17 and 19 of the Subsidy Management Act, and bus companies in Jeonju-si are an indirect subsidy recipient who received the indirect subsidy through Jeonju-si.

The Jeonju-si has designated and notified each bus company of the number of low-floor buses to be purchased in the corresponding year each year, and accordingly, it has paid subsidies for purchasing low-floor buses (50% of the indirect subsidies under the above Act and 25% of the Jeju-do and Jeonju-si, respectively) based on the business plan submitted by each bus company.

1. Defendant A, as a representative member of B Limited Partnership Company B in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was granted an indirect subsidy for the support project to introduce low-floor buses, the Defendant shall not use the subsidy for any purpose other than its original purpose.

Nevertheless, if the Defendant received KRW 493,50,000, including an indirect subsidy of KRW 246,750,000 paid by the State as a subsidy for the project to introduce low-floor buses in 201 from the Jeonju City (JJ) around July 12, 2011, the Defendant used the indirect subsidy of KRW 389,93,890 as an employee's salary on August 22, 201, for the purpose of purchasing low-floor buses, for the purpose other than the operation cost of the company, including paying KRW 389,93,890 as well as the indirect subsidy of KRW 69,03,00 paid by the State for the introduction of low-floor buses to the transportation convenience of mobility disadvantaged persons three times from around that time to April 2014.

2. Defendant B limited partnership company as above.

arrow