logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1958. 5. 27. 선고 4290행상195 판결
[행정처분취소][집6행,012]
Main Issues

The validity of a lease or sales treaty for any property devolving upon the person with no interest;

Summary of Judgment

For any property devolving upon which the right of annual appeal cannot be claimed, the property may be leased or purchased even if it exceeds the disqualified person under this Act.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 9, 15, and 35 of the Act on the Disposal of Property Belonging to Jurisdiction

Plaintiff-Appellee

Stick-in-age

Defendant-Appellant

Director General of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Government

Defendant, Intervenor, and Intervenor

55 144

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 56Da210 delivered on August 19, 1957

Reasons

The theory seems to be an argument that only the person having the right of annual interest can rent or purchase the property devolving upon the lease or purchase of the property devolving upon the State. However, the person having the right of annual interest can first do so, and as to the property devolving upon the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the United States of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State

Justices White-sung (Presiding Justice)

arrow