1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 76,321,257 with the Plaintiff, and 5% per annum from March 21, 2013 to December 15, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The construction of Gangwon-do General Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Gangwon-do Construction”) is a construction company that is in charge of the construction of the construction of the B convalescent, and the construction of the Defendant Dog Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Dog Construction”) is a subcontractor for the construction of the said new construction from the Defendant Dog Civil Construction, and is the Plaintiff’s employer, and the Plaintiff is a worker employed for the construction of the Defendant Dog

B. On March 21, 2013, around 13:20 on March 21, 2013, the Plaintiff, at the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the building of the building of the two floors, and two other workers of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). 【No dispute exists, the entries and images of Gap evidence 2 through 7, and 11 (including branch numbers), the witness C's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts acknowledged as above and the evidence revealed above, the accident of this case is not a safe method to have the workers cut down the joint board by using pipes connecting the fourth and the second floor, but rather, it is caused by the negligence of Defendant Gangwon General Construction who violated Article 29 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act due to the failure to properly perform the duty of safety consideration to the workers, or the duty of safety supervision to supervise the construction site, such as having the workers do work in such a manner as to enhance the working speed, or failing to properly perform the duty of safety supervision for the work site, and the duty of safety supervision for the work with high risk of accidents, or the duty of supervision by the supervisor, and thereby failing to properly perform the duty of safety supervision for the work with high risk of accidents.

Therefore, the Defendants are subject to Article 760 of the Civil Act.