logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2015.06.11 2015누34
임대주택분양전환승인처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Hoho Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Shoho Lake Construction”) constructed B-Lease 1,362 households (hereinafter “instant apartment”) on the land located in Jeonyang-si, which is located in C, and operated a leasing business for the said apartment. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “the Intervenor”) purchased each apartment house from Sungho Construction and took over the status of a leasing business entity for the relevant part of the apartment house as indicated below. The Plaintiffs concluded a lease contract on the apartment house at each of the respective addresses of the Plaintiffs, including Hoho Construction Co., Ltd. or the Intervenor Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the Plaintiffs were the lessees who resided in the relevant household.

Buyer, J 104 107, 207. 20. 8, 200. B 107. 20. 8, 205, 1006, 100. 16. 8, 207. 20. 8, 205, 207. 10. 8, 205, 207. 10. 6. 8, 205, 207. 10, 206. 8, 207. 10, 207. 10, 206. 8. 1, 205, 207. 10, 205, 207. 10, 205, 207. 4. 1, 205, 207. 3, 205, 207. 10, 2010

On October 26, 2010 and November 2, 2010, the Intervenor, including the Intervenor, filed an application for approval for conversion of the sale of rental housing with respect to 90 households purchased by the Intervenor, etc. among the apartment of this case, together with a rental business operator limited liability company, which purchased some of the apartment of this case from Hoho Construction (hereinafter, including the Intervenor, referred to as “the Intervenor, etc.”).

arrow