1. As to each of the Plaintiff’s shares 1/5, the Defendants:

(a) remove the buildings listed in Attachment No. 2;

1. In full view of the purport of each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and Eul evidence Nos. 3 (including each number), the plaintiff acquired the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the site in this case") from GJ on August 26, 2014, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the site in this case, the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as "the building in this case"), which was approved for use on July 20, 195 (hereinafter referred to as "the building in this case"), is constructed on July 7, 2010. The defendants owned shares 1/5 shares of the building in this case by completing the registration of ownership transfer on the grounds of inheritance on February 28, 2007. According to the above facts, according to the above facts, the defendants are obligated to seek the exclusion of interference as the owner of each of the site in this case.

2. Judgment on the defendants' assertion

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s father’s husband obtained superficies for the purpose of owning the building by constructing the land of the instant building, which is the instant building, with the Defendant’s previous owner’s consent to use the land free of charge in around 1994. Thus, according to Article 280(1)1 of the Civil Act, he/she has the right to use the instant land until July 19, 2025, when 30 years have elapsed from July 20, 1995, pursuant to Article 280(1)1 of the Civil Act.