logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.05.08 2019가단540607
대여금
Text

1. The defendant jointly and severally with C to the plaintiff KRW 85,65,000 within the limit of KRW 120,000 and KRW 84,576 among them.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, the “creditor” and “debtor” are based on the judgment deemed to be a confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act). 2. The Defendant submitted a written objection with the delivery of a payment order. However, the said written objection is merely stated in the purport of objection against the payment order, but it does not constitute a reply pursuant to Article 256 of the Civil Procedure Act, on the ground that there is no specific entry in the content of disputing the Plaintiff’s claim.

Although the defendant was served with the recommendation of correction and the order of preparation, the defendant did not submit the documents that indicate the defendant's assertion, such as the written reply or the preparatory documents, to the effect that he would later submit the documents stating the actual

The defendant did not appear on the designated date for pleading even after being notified of legitimate date.

Ultimately, the defendant is deemed to have led to the confession of the plaintiff's assertion of claim.

arrow