1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this decision are used in part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. In addition to the addition of the judgment of the plaintiff to "paragraph 3", the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Part of the fourth 19th 19th 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “this case’s agreement” was referred to as “this case’s agreement, even if the plaintiff considered all the evidence submitted by it to this court and the circumstances of its assertion.”

B. Part 18 of the fifth decision of the first instance court "the instant agreement" shall be referred to as "the instant contract".

C. Article 11 of the 6th trial decision of the first instance court provides that “The only evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to this court” shall be determined as follows: “All the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to this court and the circumstances surrounding its assertion.”

The 7th trial decision of the first instance court stated the portion “ alone by the evidence submitted by the plaintiff” as follows: “All evidence submitted by the plaintiff to this court and the circumstances surrounding the assertion are alone.”

3. Additional determination on the Plaintiff’s assertion

A. In light of the terms and conditions of the instant contract concluded on April 17, 2014 and the agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant B, which concluded on May 2014, 2014, the Plaintiff’s assertion that “the sales proceeds from the sale of the instant swimming pool in the name of the Defendant B shall be paid to the Plaintiff” (hereinafter “instant agreement”) constitutes “sale on commission,” since Defendant B decided to sell and sell the instant swimming pool on its own account.

Therefore, Defendant B should sell the instant wedding by fulfilling his responsibility as commission agent, and if he was unable to sell it in the process of making the said gambling, he should have taken measures, such as transferring it to the Plaintiff prior to the damage.