The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 16:00 on July 3, 2013, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) the victim C, who has been engaged in environmental surveillance and control in Goyang-gu B M, Goyang-gu; (b) the victim C, who was in charge of environmental surveillance and control, asked the address, etc. of the victim C, to explain the control situation at issue; (c) other control causes D; and (d) the victim did not talk with the address, etc. again; and (d) the victim discovered a detailed statement of transaction within the incineration and attempted to take a photograph thereof; and (e) the victim was faced with the victim’s head, shoulder, and tension with the victim’s head through incineration; and (e) the victim was faced with the victim’s head, the head of the head part in need of medical treatment for four weeks; and (e) the salt and tension of the tyebb

2. The above facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, it can be recognized that the victim C withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on or around December 17, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.