1. The Defendant: KRW 9,300,000 to Plaintiff A; KRW 9,895,000 to Plaintiff B; KRW 7,350,000 to Plaintiff C; and KRW 5,730 to Plaintiff D.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. In full view of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence 1-1 to 4, the defendant: (a) 1,30,000 won (= KRW 1,930,870,000) shall be paid 2,280,000 won (= KRW 2,210,000) to the plaintiff on January 31, 2015; (b) 2,95,000 won (= KRW 440,000, KRW 1,940,000, KRW 2,315,000, KRW 2,660, KRW 2,540, KRW 2,540, KRW 700, KRW 308, KRW 305, KRW 1,005, KRW 3005, KRW 3005, KRW 2,005, KRW 3005, KRW 3005, KRW 3005,005.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is liable to the plaintiff A for delay from the date following the expiration of the due date after February 1, 2015 [the main text of Article 387(1) of the Civil Act] to the following day after the due date for payment of KRW 9,300,000 to the plaintiff B, KRW 9,895,000 to the plaintiff C, KRW 7,350,000 to the plaintiff, and KRW 5,730,00 to the plaintiff D, and each of them shall be liable for delay from the following day of the due date after the due date for payment (the main text of Article 387(1) of the Civil Act shall be applicable to the law. However, this means that the due date is excessive, so the defendant is liable for delay from the following day after the due date to November 8, 198 to the due date of 105% annual interest rate of KRW 15,2500,000.

2. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion