logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.04 2014가단51777
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,615,849 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 4, 2014 to February 4, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a person engaged in restaurant business under the trade name of "F" in Daegu Suwon-gu E.

On August 2, 2014, at around 14:39, the Defendant: (a) prepared food orders, such as booming, etc. from the Plaintiff’s mother C accompanied by the Plaintiff, who is an infant, and transported food to the above C and the Plaintiff, such as booming.

At the same time, the Plaintiff was in a state of investment in the table table and its surrounding floor, and the Defendant also recognized that he was in a state of keeping the string of water on the table, etc., and the Defendant was in a state of transporting food accompanied by young children, such as hot rab, etc., and thus, a person engaged in restaurant business has a duty of care to easily look at the table surrounding the table and deliver safe food to customers.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and transports and delivers food, such as heavy fluent fluor, to the above C and the plaintiff.

The Korean government, which had been transported by cutting down the water on the floor, has led to the investment of the Korean government into the body of the plaintiff.

The Defendant suffered pictures including less than 10% of the physical surface that requires approximately five weeks of treatment from the Plaintiff due to such occupational negligence.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The defendant was indicted as a crime of injury by occupational negligence and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year in June of the imprisonment without prison labor (Tgu District Court 2014Sang58), and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

C. The defendant deposited KRW 5 million for the plaintiff in the above criminal case procedure.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 4, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant caused the accident of this case by occupational negligence.

arrow