logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.02.14 2018나90534
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a corporation established under the Korea Electric Power Corporation Act, and is a corporation that sells electricity to the consumers of electricity within the Republic of Korea with the permission from the competent authority for the electric sales business, and the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the supply of electricity with the Defendant at 290kW on the land of Pyeongtaek-si.

B. Nonparty E and Nonparty Co., Ltd. used electricity to their own customers at the same place.

(the plaintiff is a mother customer).

In the above place, three measuring instruments are installed in order to measure the amount of electricity used by the Plaintiff, E, and G, and the Defendant: (a) deducts the amount of electricity used measured in the self-measurement of the Plaintiff, E, and G, which are its customers, from the total amount of electricity used measured by the comprehensive power meter (hereinafter “the instant collective measuring instrument”), and imposes electricity charges on the Plaintiff, who is its mother customer, by deeming the remaining amount of electricity used by the Plaintiff.

(E’s self-measurement was installed around February 7, 2014, and this case’s self-measurement was “the self-measurement”). Meanwhile, there is no measuring instrument that enables mother customers to measure electric consumption independently.

A

D. On March 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to conduct a test on the premise that the breakdown of the measuring instrument was doubtful, and the Defendant confirmed that there was R and Tatch of the instant self-measurement and installed a new measuring instrument on April 29, 2017, and confirmed that a part of the electric consumption from January 29, 2017 to April 29, 2017 was transferred to the Plaintiff due to the foregoing R and Tatch.

E. Meanwhile, during the period from March 2014 to March 2017, the details on which the Defendant imposed the electricity fee on the Plaintiff, and the details on which the Plaintiff paid the electricity fee to the Defendant are indicated as follows.

The electricity charges imposed on March 10, 2014, KRW 10,225,430, KRW 10,225,430 on April 7, 2014, KRW 10,225,430, KRW 10,971,020 on April 10, 2014.

arrow