The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a bicycle.

On November 27, 2012, the Defendant driven the above bicycle at around 08:35, and proceeded ahead of 238-104 of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Additional Road 238-104 at the speed of the Si and the Si and the Si and the Si and the Si and the Si and the Si and the Si and the Si and the Gu and the Si and the Si and the Si and the Gu have

At the time, the Defendant followed the instant golf car driven by the victim B, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by securing a safety distance so that the vehicle in front stops.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to stop the above vehicle due to negligence close to the victim's vehicle and found it late, and tried to keep it right, and received the victim's front door as the defendant's bicycle rear wheels.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the said car to cover repair costs equivalent to KRW 1,441,616 due to the above occupational negligence.

2. This part of the facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since the above victim submitted a written agreement around September 23, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, to the effect that the above victim did not wish to punish the defendant, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.