(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.10 2017노1619 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.10 2017노1619

사기

Text

The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and six months.

Defendant

B, C.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A’s punishment (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

(c)

Defendant

C) Fact-finding misunderstanding [the part concerning fraud against the victim S (2016 high group 2566 case)] A was introduced by introducing A while it was necessary to arrange employment of 40 million won in return for arranging employment of 1 person for employment. However, it was unaware that A, as well as she employed 2 persons from his her her s, acquired 70 million won in the name of deceiving 70 million won. Thus, the judgment of the court below that the Defendant is liable for 40 million won only but all of the 70 million won in the name of receiving her employment.

B) The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (7 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 2 years of community service) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant B and C of the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination as to Defendant C’s assertion of mistake of facts

A. The lower court determined that the Defendant also was liable for the entire crime against S on the ground that the Defendant did not specify the number of employees to be employed and the amount of money to be received under the pretext of employment when the Defendant and A conspired to commit the crime, and the Defendant introduced S to A.

B. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant introduced S through AE and made several telephone conversationss with S, and the defendant introduced S and sent them to S, and the defendant introduced AE to find employment, and if there is a person who wants to find employment, the defendant introduced him/her to find employment, and the defendant stated to the effect that he/she sent him/her the Defendant's phone number to S, and that he/she stated that he/she was "to have him/her find out," and that he/she provided him/her with the Defendant's phone number, and that he/she provided him/her with his/her her her her her her her her her her her her and her her her her her her her her her her her her hersk and her her her two her her

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.10.20 2015노558

-서울고등법원 2017.05.11 2016노3817 (1)

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.07.14 2014고단522

-부산고등법원 2019.08.29 2019노98

-서울동부지방법원 2020.01.17 2018노1732