1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

In Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Unauthorized Housing (hereinafter “instant Housing”) was intended to be included in the project district of the residential environment improvement project implemented by the head of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the ownership was changed to the Defendant, who is the deceased’s child in the network D (hereinafter “the deceased”).

Each of them promises to equal division according to the inheritance share of eight persons listed on the family register for the special right to sell national housing and compensation for losses incurred after the vehicle in this case owned by the deceased.

Although the instant house was registered in the name of the Defendant in the form of form, it is a co-ownership according to the shares of the deceased’s heir (8).

Provided, That where taxes, other expenses, etc. are incurred, they shall be borne equally according to each inheritance share.

Around July 10, 2007, the deceased’s heir, the Plaintiff (C), G, H, I, J (which are children between the deceased and the Plaintiff), K, L, and the Defendant (which are children between the deceased and the Plaintiff) sold the right to sell the national housing specially supplied as part of the relocation measures against the owner of the removed housing in the course of the implementation of the said project (hereinafter “instant right to sell the housing”) to others and distributed the profits therefrom (hereinafter “each of the instant reports”).

Since then, according to the measures for resettlement of the above project, the defendant was specially supplied for the sale price of F 115 dong 302 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") located in Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") in KRW 328,373,00, but did not sell the sale price to others due to statutory restrictions, but did not sell the sale price within the period of application for parcelling-out within the period of application for parcelling-out (from May 19, 2014 to May 22, 2014).

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4, Eul evidence No. 1 (the same as Eul evidence No. 3), Eul evidence No. 4, and the fact-finding results of the court of first instance as to E.S. Corporation, the plaintiff's assertion to the purport of the whole pleadings.