logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.01 2016가합550832
손해배상등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s 26,262,921 won and 5% per annum from December 17, 2016 to June 1, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant (i) concluded an agency contract with the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s agency contract, etc.) is a company that produces “Nosp” and other products, and the Plaintiff is an agency contract with the Defendant on December 16, 2013 (hereinafter “instant agency contract”).

The details of the contract are as follows. Article 18(1) of the Act provides that “A” shall be provided to “A” with facility standards necessary for store interior interior surgery, and matters concerning construction works, and the business entity designated by “A” with “B” and “B” with “B” with “B” and “B” with “B” with “a” with this confirmation and with respect to their occupation; and (2) the cost of the installation, maintenance, repair, ice and removal of the sales store facilities shall be borne by “B”. ⑤ Article 22(1) of the Act provides that “A” shall be borne by “B” with respect to the installation, maintenance, repair, ice and removal of the sales store facilities; or where there are objective circumstances that make it difficult to achieve the purpose of this contract, such as the enhancement of brand competitiveness; ② “A” or “B” shall be notified in writing to the other party three months before the termination of the contract due to the reasons under the preceding paragraph; ③ Where one party has suffered damages to the other party in violation of the preceding paragraph, the damages shall be calculated as follows:

except where it is proved that the contractual breach was caused by a cause not attributable to him/her.

§ 24 (1) The term of validity of this contract shall be one year only from the date of conclusion of the contract.

(2) This paper.

arrow