A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 4 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On August 24, 2018, the Defendant: “D Gameland” operated by the victim C on the second floor of the Daejeon Jung-gu building B in Daejeon, Daejeon; the Defendant passed around, and opened a door at the rate of the rate and intrudes into the game room by using a sadur in advance preparation for the chip’s chip’s chip with a fixed entrance of the entrance when the entrance came to the place; then, the Defendant opened the door at the rate of the rate; then, after manipulating the locked number number of the labs installed in the game room into the lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab’s lab

In other words, they stolen them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Records of seizure and list of seizure and photographs of the site of seizure;

1. Application of the thief reporting, field photographs, investigation reports (the tracking and specific investigation before and after the commission of the criminal suspect), attachment of guidance on the crime of the criminal suspect, application of the Cctv photographic Acts and subordinate statutes related to the crime of the criminal suspect;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age, occupation, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and the various conditions of sentencing as ordered by the argument of the case, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, and other conditions of sentencing as stated in the argument of the case.

The favorable circumstances: The confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake; the circumstances that part of the amount of damage was confiscated to be restored to the victim that part of the damage was restored to the victim: in light of the background and content of the crime of this case, the nature and circumstances of the crime of this case are very poor; the crime of this case was committed repeatedly in the same kind despite having been punished several times due to the same crime; the total amount of damage was not significant; the victim did not agree with the victim; and the full amount of damage was not paid up to now.