logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.01.27 2015고단1052
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 29, 2014, the Defendant was released from prosecution in the Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office on the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and was aware that the Defendant could be used for crimes, such as scaming, if he provides the name-influor who assumes the borrower with an access medium, such as physical cards, etc.

Nevertheless, around August 2015, the Defendant, in front of the Defendant’s company’s accommodation in the Hanju-si, sent a name-free winner who misrepresented the borrower, through Kwikset Service Articles, sent a copy of the C C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C

Accordingly, the defendant, knowing that he will be used in the crime, lent a approaching medium.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the details and materials of financial transactions;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 3 (excluding punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the crime was committed for the same kind of crime as the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with the order of provisional payment, even though the suspension of indictment was imposed, the crime was abused for the crime of Bosing and thus there is a great need for punishment, and the amount of substantial damage, etc.

arrow