logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.07 2014나4925
소유권이전등록
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) KRW 19 million in total of KRW 17 million in the vehicle number of KRW 17 million in the second instance judgment and KRW 2 million in the second instance judgment; and (b) KRW 16 in the second instance judgment upon receiving a favorable judgment on December 3, 2013 and the above judgment was rendered on December 19, 2013; and (c) thus, it is identical to the entry of the first instance judgment, except that the said judgment is “a final and conclusive fact as of December 19, 2013” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow