logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.11 2017고단1875
특수상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 06:05 on July 30, 2016, the Defendant indicted the Defendant on charges that he was injured on the part of the victim's bridge, which was a dangerous object on his table, due to the fact that he did drinking in the side while drinking alcohol together with the son at a main station located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and that he did so, and that he did so, he did so, and the prosecutor collected the scV's sct's sct's sct's scke, which was submitted by the Defendant. However, the Defendant's sct's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's scke's right to defense on the part of the victim's bridge to the extent of the victim's s right to defense.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements of each written statement of the police officer examination of D, E, F, G, H, and I concerning D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, on-site photographs, and damaged photographs (D such photographs);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence is that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected in the sentencing of the defendant, and the defendant committed a luxation in the course of dispute between the defendant's behavior and the victim's behavior, and the defendant was faced with the luxation in the victim. The defendant's luxation was broken, and the damage was caused by the defendant's luxation, and the defendant's intentional injury caused by the dangerous article seems to be the extent of doluxism, and the part of the damage compensation is part.

arrow