1. The Defendant’s KRW 45,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from September 2, 2016 to October 18, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From July 2011, the Plaintiff took an educational system with the Defendant and went into the form of a relationship with the Defendant, and came into the relationship with the Plaintiff around September 2015.

B. On June 26, 2015, the Plaintiff remitted KRW 15 million to the Defendant’s bank account, and on August 31, 2015, remitted KRW 30 million to the Defendant’s bank account.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1-4 (including virtual number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) the Defendant intended to enter into a lease agreement on E (the foregoing leased real estate; hereinafter referred to as “instant leased real estate”) on the third floor of Heung City building 3; (b) the Plaintiff requested a loan of KRW 300,000 to the Plaintiff as it is difficult to lend credit; (c) and (d) the Plaintiff demanded a loan of KRW 28,000,000 to move out of the leased real estate 30,000,000 to the Defendant’s new bank account on June 26, 2015; (d) KRW 15,000,000,000 won out of KRW 300,000,000 won out of KRW 28,50,000,000,000 won out of KRW 300,000,000 won received from the Defendant’s new bank account on August 3, 2015; and (e) KRW 2808,0,000,0,0000.