1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 18,808,400 and Defendant B Co., Ltd. with respect thereto from October 11, 2018 and Defendant C.

1. As to the claim against Defendant B

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the owner of a building located on the ground D, Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant building”).

There is no dispute between the parties.

B) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Construction Company”)

)는 토목건축공사업 등을 영위하는 법인으로 서천군청으로부터 공사기간을 2014. 12. 31.부터 2016. 7.31.까지로 정하여 충남 서천군 E공사를 도급받아 충남 서천군 F 일대에서 공사를 하였다. 피고 건설사는 공사 현장의 지질조사를 하고 터파기 및 항타 방법으로 공사를 시행하였는데, 2016. 3. 22. 시행한 터파기 공사 이후 이 사건 건축물을 포함하여 공사현장과 일렬로 형성된 29개소 건물에 벽체 균열, 지반 침하 등이 발생하였다. 다) 피고 C 주식회사(이하 ‘피고 보험사’라 한다)는 이 사건 건축물과 같이 시기에 피해를 입은 G 등 주변 건물의 소유자 등에게 2017. 9. 14.부터 2018. 10. 29.까지 사이에 합계 385,920,000원을 지급하였다.

[Reasons for Recognition] Fact-finding, Gap evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 4-2, Eul evidence 1-3-5, Eul evidence 1-1-5, Gap evidence 1-1-5, and the purport of the whole pleadings as a whole, the above-mentioned facts were examined. According to the above-mentioned facts, the defendant construction company should have taken measures to prevent shock and vibration caused by construction, such as reinforcement facilities, in order to prevent damage to surrounding buildings, such as the building of this case, etc., while carrying out construction in the vicinity of the building of this case, but it can be recognized that the damage was caused to the plaintiff due to the destruction of the building of this case. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damage caused to the plaintiff by the tort. (b) The property damage caused to the plaintiff is described as Gap evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 5, and Eul evidence 5.