logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.08 2016가합578908
하자보수에 갈음하는 손해배상 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against defendant C and D shall be dismissed, respectively.

2. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the party to the instant condominium (hereinafter “instant condominium”) which is an aggregate building of Busan Shipping Daegu HG in Busan.

(2) The Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a business entity that constructed and sold the instant aggregate building after obtaining business approval on January 14, 2009, and the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) and Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) are the contractor that constructed the instant aggregate building and the Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) guaranteed the obligation to repair defects in the instant aggregate building.

B. From January 23, 2015 to January 22, 2016, I signed the warranty period of the instant aggregate building No. 119,93,563 K on January 23, 2015 to January 22, 2016, J. 2 J. 119,93, 563 K on January 22, 2017 to January 22, 2017, and Defendant 202,08,085,6424 L. 1 to January 23, 2015 to the warranty period of the instant aggregate building No. 350,191,405 (1 to January 25, 2015), and Defendant 206-3, respectively, issued the warranty bond of the instant aggregate of the instant aggregate building No. 102,085,6424 L. 24 to January 23, 2015 to 206.

C. Defendant C and D constructed the instant aggregate building and did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawings, or constructed it differently or poorly from the drawings. Accordingly, there were defects, such as rupture and water leakage, in common areas and exclusive areas of exclusive ownership of the instant aggregate building.

Accordingly, from July 16, 2015, the Plaintiff continuously requested the repair of defects to Defendant C or Defendant B.

arrow