The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal explicitly withdrawn the allegation of mental disorder on the second trial date.

The punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant (five years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant, where the Defendant was aware of the victim’s identity as the seat of the person who was next to the Defendant, and the Defendant threatened the victim with the appearance of a dangerous object by cutting down his name, threatening the victim to assaulting the victim, threatening the resistance, which is an dangerous object, and imprisoned, and rape the victim and suffered bodily injury in the course of committing the crime. The nature of the crime and method of committing the crime of this case is very poor; the victim was suffering from considerable mental and physical shock and suffering, and caused a sense of sexual humiliation, and the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim.

On the other hand, the following are the circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake; (b) the Defendant has no record of being punished as a sexual crime; and (c) the instant crime is in a concurrent relationship with a special injury as indicated in the judgment of the lower court and a group of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, which are favorable to the Defendant.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 ◈ 처단형의 범위: 징역 3년 6월 ~ 7년 6월 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 여부 판결이 확정된 원심 판시 특수 상해죄와 형법 제 37조 후 단의 경합범 관계에 있으므로 양형기준이 적용되지 아니함 , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조) 등을 종합해 보면, 원심이 피고인에게...