1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2.As to the case of application for suspension of compulsory execution in this Court 2015 Chicago10133

1. The assertion and judgment

A. In order to conclude an administrative service contract related to the liquidation and dissolution of the non-party association for the land readjustment and rearrangement project of the non-party association (hereinafter “non-party association”), the movable property indicated in the attached list of the plaintiff’s assertion (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movable property”) is owned by the plaintiff, not the non-party association. Thus, the compulsory execution against the instant corporeal movable property by the defendant (appointed party) and the designated parties against the non-party association based on the original copy of the decision on the amount of litigation cost determination under the Incheon District Court Decision 2014A324 (hereinafter “the title of execution of this case”) shall be denied.

B. In the case where a third party has a right to prevent ownership or transfer of, or transfer of, the subject matter of execution, a lawsuit seeking the exclusion of enforcement by raising an objection to a compulsory execution that infringes on the right. The burden of proving that the subject matter of execution is the Plaintiff’s ownership or the right to prevent transfer or transfer of, the subject matter of execution has the burden of proving that the subject matter of execution is the Plaintiff’s ownership or the right to prevent transfer or transfer of, to the Plaintiff. Therefore, the above assertion has no merit,

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit.