1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and such reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

The “Evidence A through 10” is added to the “Evidence A through 10” in the third-party 7 through 8 of the first instance judgment.

Around December 11, 2014, the first instance judgment of December 12, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the “Before December 11, 2015”) is deemed to be “ around December 11, 2014.”

Under the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment, the fifth to fourth sentence shall be dismissed as follows:

Evidence A, 11 through 15 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2) If the substance of the evidence No. 8, 9, and 10 are written, and the purport of the entire argument is examined as a result of the order to submit tax information and the reply to the permanent resident tax office of this Court, the revenue and expenditure of the instant union are as follows: (a) the fifth to fifth to fifth are the revenue and expenditure of the instant union.

Although the plaintiff asserts that "(the plaintiff is difficult to believe the contents in Eul evidence No. 9 submitted by the defendant, and according to the result of the inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry into the National Livestock Science Institute of Korea in the first instance court, it was hard to recognize that the defendant obtained more profits than the above amount of money as the defendant's person, only the fact inquiry inquiry inquiry result merely is presumed, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there is no other evidence.

) The fifth to tenth parts of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows.

No. 15,00,000 won (No. 19) paid by the Plaintiff to J on December 12, 2014 (No. 200,000 won to the Defendant’s husband and 15,000,000 won remaining after the payment in kind in pigs was made by the Plaintiff (No. 19). According to this, the above amount cannot be deemed to have been paid at the expense of the instant association, and it shall be deemed that the said amount has been paid later, as alleged by the Plaintiff.

(6) The amount of compensation for the relief station in arrears for the defendant shall be 26,543.