The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant posted the same article as the facts charged, but the contents are true, not false facts, but true, and it was made in the public intent of notifying the victims of the criminal acts, and there was no purpose of slandering.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. In determining whether the facts alleged in the crime of defamation by a statement of false facts are false or not, if the facts alleged in the crime of defamation by a statement of false facts are different from the truth or somewhat exaggerated expressions in light of the overall purport of the alleged facts, it shall not be deemed as false or false (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Do6343, Nov. 15, 2012, etc.). (2) Whether an actor knows that the facts were false or not, in light of its nature, it is difficult to know or prove them from the outside, by taking into account the contents, personal history, social status, timing of publication, and expected ripple effect of the facts (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Do2627, Jul. 22, 2005).