logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.12.15 2017노2514
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (or four months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of community service order) is too unfluent and unfair.

Judgment

The crime of this case committed by the Defendant was committed by the Defendant (hereinafter “F”) with a high school student, who was aware of this online game (hereinafter “victims, who committed suicide at the age of 21 and 12 January 2, 2017”), and with the victim (hereinafter “victims”) who was the victim of this case, for a minor reason during the conversation with the Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Ka, which led to the instant crime for the purpose of harming the victim’s complaint and slandering the victim. Under this law, the illegality of the law is very bad by putting a notice to many people by maliciously manipulating the contents of the conversation between the Defendant and the victim.

The defendant's crime is a complete false content with respect to the victim in an online game room with 14 members of the online game conference, and it is essential that "the name of the victim (the name of the victim) has been discussed before one year.

At that time, the male-friendly tool was also and the refusal intention was expressed several times, but the chest photographs and telephone conversations was requested.

“I even start from Seoul to Incheon, I knew that I would know that I would am, and am you would like to take the Hand-on, so I would like to write I would like to write I would like to write I would like to the male-child-gu and write I would like to write I would like to write I would like to am.

The purpose of “Absing out a writing to gather the victim” and inserting false data as if the victim had sent a variety of text messages corresponding to salking, intimidation, salking, etc. to the Defendant using the F mentioned above (see the corresponding content of the crime in the judgment of the court below). (See the corresponding content of the crime in the attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court below) The nature and the criminal history of the crime committed by the Defendant are deemed to be extremely bad.

The above damage is caused by the Defendant.

arrow