Defendant shall be punished by a fine of nine million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 9, 2018, at around 10:15, the Defendant: (a) opened a front door of the Flauna cab parked in front of the “D cafeteria” located in Southern-gu, Southern-gu, Seoul, without correcting the locking device, and stolen the cash amounting to KRW 1.20,000,000 in the vehicle.

2. On August 12, 2018, at around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a front door of the HK3 passenger car parked by the victim G without correcting locking devices in front of the “original gender 1 Dong community service center” located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, Seoul; and (b) cut off the cash amounting to KRW 10,000,000 in the vehicle.

3. On August 13, 2018, around 15:20, the Defendant: (a) opened a back door of the driver’s seat of the Jststuna vehicle in the vehicle in the vehicle, which the victim I parked at the parking lot “Seoul-dong Community Center 1, 125, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul-dong, Seoul, with no correction of locking devices; and (b) stolen it with cash equivalent to KRW 110,000,000 in the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, G, and I;

1. A written confirmation of identity of each thief;

1. A gene appraisal report;

1. Results of inquiries into convict DNA personal information;

1. The name of a suspect of a damaged vehicle screen with a screen image of the damaged vehicle;

1. On-site photographs of the case;

1. Photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Cut the screen of the damaged vehicle booms images;

1. K sperm photographs (the place where a suspect is to be collected);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to cover a screen of damaged vehicles booms images;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime or received juvenile protective disposition on several occasions.

In particular, the defendant is under suspension of execution after being sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime.