logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.06.29 2018고정47
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”) is a person engaging in driving a C rocketing car.

On September 3, 2017, the Defendant driven the above rocketing car at around 19:45 on September 3, 2017, and made the left turn to the left at the front of the E-distance in Ulsan-gun D from the right edge of the two-lane between the two-lanes.

Since there is a place where the left turn can be left at all, there was a duty of care to make a left turn safely while paying attention to the flow of the opposite vehicle in green name.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not pay attention to the flow of the vehicle in the opposite lane in green, and did not turn to the left from the opposite lane in Busan to the opposite lane, and received the front part of the victim F(I, 44 years old)'s G driving on the opposite lane from Busan to the opposite lane, and received the front part of the above rocketing car as the front part.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to sugars, etc. without any room within two weeks in which medical treatment is open for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant damaged the 11,396,614 won of repair costs, such as Litter exchange, to the extent that the said 11,396,614 won was damaged.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act operated C rocketing automobiles that did not purchase mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire into mandatory insurance for vehicles under consideration;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (including occupational and de facto items), Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of damage to occupational and de facto property), Article 46 (2) and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Automobile Damages Act (the point of which is not mandatory insurance);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow