Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of defamation by publications at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 24, 2015.

On July 1, 2011, the Defendant was appointed as the president of the Do branch and performed the duties of the president. The president of the Do branch, as the president of the Do branch, has managed the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Do branch (E) in the name of the Do branch, and has kept the public funds of the Do branch for business purposes.

The Defendant, upon receipt of a criminal appeal suit against himself/herself with an investigative agency, was indicted as defamation by publication of Seoul Southern District Court 2014 High Order 1552 High Court Order 2014 High Court Order 2014 High Court Order 2014 High Court Order 4307 High Court Order and violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation). On February 10, 2015, the Defendant embezzled KRW 70,000,000 from the agricultural bank account of Seoul Southern District Court, which was kept in business in the office of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, to the new bank account (H) with respect to the Defendant’s criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the witness I in the third public trial protocol;

1. Investigation reports (Binding the written rulings, etc. of related cases);

1. Investigation report (Bindings, such as copies of bankbooks of deposits in the D branch associations);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to suspect data);

1. Article 356 of the Criminal Act and Article 355 (1) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (excluding punishment);

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel used money as stated in the facts of the crime, although the judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the cost of lawsuit was used as stated in the judgment, this is from the special account organized by the Defendant in relation to the class D gathering at the meeting of the board of representatives of the D branch councils on February 6, 2015.