1. The precision between the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant corporation is jointly with the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and KRW 11,695,469.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On August 16, 2010, the Plaintiff was employed by C as a manufacturer of the automobile parts operated by C and worked as quality control (tallying) work. On September 6, 2010, the Plaintiff sent the automobile parts to the Defendant East East-si 60-9 located in Asan-si, Sinsan-si, pursuant to the human resource contract between C and the Defendant East-si, and had the goods tally inspected work since that time. (2) On the other hand, the Defendant B was employed from December 1, 2010 to E (representativeF) and was employed on November 25, 2010 in the construction machinery and the Defendant East-si Hayang-si’s workplace under the contract between B and the Defendant Yangyang-si (hereinafter “the instant car”) and dispatched the automobile parts owned by the Plaintiff under the direction of the Defendant East-si to the instant vehicle and the instant automobile parts to be loaded under the direction of the instant vehicle.

B. (1) On February 1, 2011, Defendant B’s relocation site (hereinafter “instant workplace”) from among Defendant Dongyang-si’s workplace around February 11, 201.

) While driving the instant vehicle at the instant location, while going back, the Plaintiff was faced with the instant lane and the Plaintiff was faced with the Plaintiff’s bridge while driving the instant vehicle at the instant location, and then driving the instant vehicle, while driving the instant vehicle again, resulting in the Plaintiff’s injury on the left-hand pelle and the non-permanent laverization of the instant vehicle, which requires six months of hospitalization (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) At the time, Defendant B did not have an operator license for construction machinery, such as forkin tea, and Defendant B’s dynamic was moved from the instant workplace to the backer, and Defendant B did not assign aquatic signal workers, supervisors, etc. in performing dual work.