logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.18 2014고단399
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and two months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After the Defendants conspired to operate an illegal speculative game room, the Defendants: (a) as a business proprietor, Defendant A had the overall operation of the game room and exchange work; (b) Defendant B had the duty to resolve the problems of customers who see or avoid a disturbance in preparation for the crackdown by an investigative agency; and (c) Defendant C shared the respective roles of Defendant A with the intent to take charge of the duties of practicing the Ewn Sckn's multiple customers leased by Defendant A in the game room; and (d) employed Defendant F, G, and H as an employee.

Therefore, the Defendants conspired with F, G, and H on January 10, 201 to January 22:00, 2014, the first floor of the building located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, installed 37 game equipment “sea camping” on the first floor, and charged 10% of the amount of the money received from customers in return for money and the pre-determined filling card using a card terminal, and had customers recognize the filling card on the card recognition machine installed in the game machine, the amount of 100 points per game was deducted, so that the number of points was continuously heated on the screen of the game machine to obtain points by the rate set in advance according to the results of continuous heating of the picture or number, and if customers wish to exchange, they exchanged the above points in cash in the amount of 10% of the fee deducted from the above points.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with F, G, and H to perform speculative acts using game products in collusion with F, G, and H, provided ungraded “sea camping” game products for use, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol in F, G, and H;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Relevant provisions concerning the promotion of the game industry regarding facts constituting a crime;

arrow