1. The Defendant: from November 25, 2015 to November 25, 2015, from the Plaintiff 15,000 to the 15,00,000, as indicated in the [Attachment C] List on the ground.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 25, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement in the list of the attached Form C of Daegu Suwon-gu C ground to the Defendant.

2. Of the buildings (hereinafter “instant building”), a lease agreement was concluded to lease 82.65 square meters of stores located in the part of the ship (hereinafter “instant leased building”) connected each point in sequence of the indication 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the attached drawing of the attached Form No. 1 floor among the buildings (hereinafter “instant building”) as follows:

- Lease deposit: 15,00,000 won - Term: November 25, 2005 to November 24, 2007 - Rent: 500,000 won per month.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant renewed the instant lease agreement on several occasions, and concluded a renewed lease agreement on November 4, 2013 as follows.

(hereinafter “Lease Agreement”). - Lease deposit: 15,00,000 won - Term: November 25, 2013 to November 24, 2015 - Rent: 1,300,000 won per month.

C. On July 20, 2015, the Plaintiff refused to renew the instant lease agreement due to the occurrence of the circumstances in which the instant building was sold after the expiration of the lease term, and thus, notified the Plaintiff that the instant building would be handed over at the expiration date of the lease term. (2) On September 16, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Plaintiff General Construction Co., Ltd. to sell the instant building and its site, and agreed on the delivery date of the instant building and its site until December 30, 2015.

3) On November 17, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that the instant leased building would be handed over to the Defendant at the time when the lease term expires. D. The Defendant occupied the instant leased building even after November 25, 2015, which is the expiration date of the instant lease contract. The Defendant occupied and used the instant leased building until now even after November 25, 2015. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. According to the fact of recognition of the duty to deliver a building, the instant lease agreement was concluded on November 24, 2015.