The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The series of the crimes in this case appears to have been derived from the social anti-defluence of the defendant, which he had a brupted period of time, and some of the crimes in this case were committed by himself during the investigation process, and the defendant seems to be against this court, and the defendant seems to have been divided into several crimes including the robbery in this case only five months after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor due to larceny, and the number of the crimes in this case is committed by the defendant. The number of the crimes in this case and the majority of the victims are crimes, and the quality of each crime in this case is very poor. In particular, among the victims of the bodily injury, there are cases where the defendant suffered a serious injury requiring six weeks medical treatment due to the brupted face and body of the defendant, the damage amount in this case was not less than 41,403,00 won, and the defendant was not found to have been disadvantageous to the defendant at the time of the court below's judgment and the court below's argument that the defendant's punishment in this case was unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(The main text of Article 43 of the 9th 8th 8th and 12th 12th son of the original judgment is clear that it is a clerical error in the text of Article 42, and thus correct it.)