Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Causes and contents of the decision in the retrial;
(a) The Seoul Special Metropolitan City shall prevent school violence and control outside persons, etc. at national and public elementary schools within the jurisdiction of around March 2011;
The school security center was assigned and operated as a job, and the budget for the project was supported every year at national and public elementary schools.
B. B elementary school is a public school established and managed by Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the Plaintiff entered into a renewal contract with B elementary school head and school security officer employment contract on March 2, 201 each year after entering into a contract with B elementary school head.
C. On January 2014, Seoul Special Metropolitan City: (a) at the national and public elementary schools within the jurisdiction including B elementary schools on January 2014, 2014, “the 2014 Guidelines for the Operation of School Security Officers” (hereinafter referred to as “the 2014 Operating Guidelines
The period of employment for human resources: The person who is employed on January 1, 2014 or December 31, 2014 (one-year basis): The person who is employed on the basis of a contract: the termination of the contract until December 31, 2014 for a person who has no grounds for disqualification for re-contract - the completion of the contract until December 31, 2014 - the detailed reasons for exclusion from re-contract (if the person is assessed to not more than 70 points in work attitude, work evaluation) from the duty evaluation data - the objective procedures for verification and inspection, which provide the person himself/herself an opportunity to vindicate his/her reasons for exclusion from re-contract - the submission of the relevant data related to the employment - the submission of the data to Seoul Metropolitan Government.
D. On November 28, 2014, the B elementary school principal issued to the Plaintiff a “Notice of the expiration of the contract term” stating that “the labor contract term expires on December 31, 2014, and the employment relationship is terminated” to the Plaintiff.
(hereinafter “instant notice”). E.
On December 4, 2014 and December 12, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office of Education about the grounds for termination of an employment contract.