A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The part of the facts charged was revised to the extent that it does not affect the defendant's defense right.

[2018Gohap263]

1. Around 01:00 on December 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) considered the victim’s face to be “Wook” at the front of the C Hospital located in B, who was on the street in front of the C Hospital located in B (60 years of age); and (b) expressed the victim’s face to the victim’s face near the face of the victim being driven by asking the Defendant’s destination at approximately 294-gil-ro, Seocheon-si, 01:28 on the same day; and (c) expressed the victim’s face at approximately 2 weeks in front of the C Hospital located in B (60 years of age); and (d) expressed that the victim’s face was tight and large at the face of the victim being driven by asking the Defendant’s destination, the victim was able to take three times the victim’s face and take about two weeks in front of his/her cell phone.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a driver of a vehicle in operation and caused the injury.

2. A thief: (a) around May 3, 2018, the Defendant: (b) worn a gark in G located in F at Sinung-si on the 21:20th day of May 3, 2018; (c) opened a cosmetic box in which his employees’ surveillance was neglected; (d) moved the contents to the Defendant’s door, and then then the Defendant’s packing box in which the victim H had the original place; (c) however, according to the description in Articles 95 through 98 of the evidence record, the Defendant stated the victim in this part of the facts charged, which is the victim’s H, as I. However, according to the evidence record, the said I is only an employee working in the said store; and (d) it is apparent that the said I was the owner of the goods at the said shop; and (e) according to the combined court [2018Dahap288]’s entry in Articles 29 through 33 of the

Therefore, since the above facts charged appear to be erroneous and do not affect the defendant's exercise of his right to defense, the victim is corrected ex officio as H.