1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be dried;

가. 3면 하단 2행부터 5행까지의 “피고는 ① 원고에게 각 지급하였다.”를 아래 『』내용으로 고쳐 쓴다.

“Defendant,” from September 12, 2002 to October 16, 2003, from December 3, 2003 to June 7, 2004, from September 30, 2004 to May 31, 2006; and from March 20, 2008 to June 26, 2008, was serving as the representative director of the F.

) Upon the request of the F, on October 9, 2007, the principal remitted 60 million won from the AH’s account, a representative director, to each F’s account on the same day, and 40 million won from his own account on October 10, 2007, respectively remitted 40 million won from his own account to T to T’s account.

(b) 8 pages 6 of the 8th page “the first loan certificate” is raised as “the second loan certificate”;

(c) at the bottom of 8 pages 4: “The entry of No. 4” has been done with “The entry of No. 18, 21, Eul No. 4 and 9, and the witness testimony of P”.

8면 하단 1행부터 9면 2행까지의 “가) 원고가 S에 작성된 것으로 보인다.”를 아래 『』내용으로 고쳐 쓴다. 『가) 피고는, 원고와 그 동생인 T의 부탁을 받고 2007. 10. 9. F에 1억 원을, 2007. 10. 10. T에게 4억 원을 송금하였고, 2008. 3. 14.경 당시 S의 대표이사인 원고로부터 제1 차용증을 작성교부받았다. 이를 통해 피고는 위 5억 원이 S에 대한 투자금이 아닌 대여금임을 분명히 하였다.』

E. From 9:4 to 5, “The Plaintiff recognized that part of the Plaintiff’s S Investments would have been borrowed from the Defendant.” The Plaintiff paid KRW 475 million to the account of the Defendant in return for the Defendant’s money deposited KRW 400 million.”

F. The 9th parallel 8th parallel to 16th parallel appears to fall under the instant F.