logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.03.18 2016고정54
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 22, 2015, the Defendant damaged the property by spreading the victim’s bath to the victim without any reason in the “D party room” operated by the victim C (the 57 years of age) (the 57 years of age) on July 22, 2015, the market price of the victim located in the party room, which is the victim’s possession in the party room, was collected from the unclaimed animal sculptures, and making the victim take the bridge of the tree sculptures to the department.

2. Obstruction of business;

A. From July 20, 2015 to around 22:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) entered a restaurant of “G” operated by the Victim FF in E at the time of the strike from around 22:40 on the same day; and (b) obstructed restaurant business by a threat of force between 50 minutes, such as spreading a bath to customers seated on the tables without any justifiable reason, and allowing them to go out of the table.

B. From July 21, 2015 to around 22:20 on July 21, 2015, the Defendant had the horses to enter the above 'G' restaurant and to the victim on July 23:20 on the same day.

However, “I do not speak, I would like to do so,” from the injured party, you see the horses, and in the cooling house, scam, scam the beer with the beer, and among the customers who are sitting on the table, they interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about one hour, such as being aground.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and C;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for negligence;

1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (Article 50) of the Criminal Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes (Article 38 (1) of the said Act appears to have led to the instant crime by the Defendant’s branch of the Defendant; the victim F does not want the Defendant’s punishment; the Defendant’s age and gender, sex, sex, environment, health conditions, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, details of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, etc. are considered as follows:

1.Article 70(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow