logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.17 2019노6365
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal: Unfair sentencing

2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, has a unique area for sentencing determination, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In this case, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment.

In addition, in full view of all the conditions of the pleadings and records of the instant crime, including the details and content of the instant crime, drinking volume (0.103%) of the Defendant, the same criminal records of the Defendant (one time, fine of KRW 3 million), and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing that sentenced the Defendant to a fine of KRW 10 million is too unfasible and thus, is deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor's appeal cannot be accepted, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow