logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.10.01 2012고단402
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on January 7, 2010, in the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, sentenced 8 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution to be imposed on June 17, 2010, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 12, 201. The said judgment became final and conclusive on November 18, 201, by being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud and three years of suspended execution for fraud in the same court on January 12, 201.

Defendant A, “2012 Highest 402,” is the actual operator of Company E, public official, and Defendant B, the representative director of the said power plant.

1. The Defendants in violation of the Commercial Act attempted to obtain a loan of KRW 9.6 billion from a new bank for the establishment of the above E, but intended to increase the capital after receiving communication from the new bank that it is impossible to obtain a loan due to the lack of capital due to the lack of capital. A.

On July 4, 2007, the Defendants, at the same time on July 4, 2007, proposed the payment of the subscription price of KRW 3,90,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the loan of the bond business operator at the Gyeongnam Bank’s 288-5, public interest and loaned to the bond business operator at the Gyeongnam Bank’s 288-5, public interest and private interest, and deposited the subscription price into the account (FF) and deposited it as the subscription price, and then withdrawn it on July 5, 2007 and used it to repay loans to

B. On July 17, 2007, the Defendants: (a) deposited KRW 400 million in the stock price payment account (F) created by lending 400 million from the bond company at the Gyeongnam Bank’s point of view and from around July 17, 2007; and (b) deposited and deposited as the stock price payment; and (c) withdrawn on July 18, 2007 and used the withdrawal thereof to repay loans to the above bond company.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make two payments.

2. False entry in the original notarial deed, and uttering of the original notarial deed;

A. On July 4, 2007

arrow