logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.09.03 2015고단1620
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those who are engaged in driving car in C.

On June 4, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at around 20:15, and driven a three-distance intersection at the entrance of the digital lighting police station at the time of light lighting at approximately 20 km each hour between the three-lanes from the steel mountain intersection to the view of light view.

Since there is a place where a vehicle line is installed, so if a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle changes the vehicle line, he/she has the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by operating the direction, etc. in advance, giving notice of change of course, and keeping the traffic situation before and after the change.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the course from a three-lane to a one-lane, and received the part from the front side of the right side of the victim D(the age of 41) to the right side of the passenger vehicle of the victim D(the age of 41) with the front side of the road of the victim D(the age of 41).

At the same time, the Defendant, by negligence on duty, suffered from the victim F (the age of 48) who was on board the said D and his/her vehicle each by taking around two weeks of medical treatment, and, at the same time, escaped without stopping the said vehicle to cause approximately KRW 1,383,809 for repair costs, and without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) provided that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in the Stimul area under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.186% from the 1km section to the 20-luminous viewing road from the optop road at the optop stimul, a optop road in the optop stimul, a optop road in the optop optop sti-si, a optop-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police on the D or F (Simplified traffic);

1. A statement of the status of the driver;

arrow