beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On February 1, 1974, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service in the Air Force on April 30, 1978 and was performing military service in the area under the jurisdiction of the YAAAEMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMY, and was so dead on March 15, 1977 while performing aircraft maintenance, and registered as a person of distinguished service to the State who was determined as having been disabled in the line of official duty in accordance with class 6(2)32 of the disability rating.
B. On March 6, 2010, the Plaintiff: (a) filed an application for registration with the Defendant on September 15, 201; (b) each additional application was filed on the ground that the injury was difficult to be deemed to have occurred in the course of performing official duties; or that the application filed on March 6, 201 was not an obstacle to daily life; (c) on the application filed on September 5, 201, by the Defendant on September 6, 201, each additional disposition was rendered to recognize the status of the Defendant as the applicant on September 5, 2010; and on the application filed on September 15, 2011, each additional disposition was rendered as of December 7, 2011.
C. On July 3, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation with the Seoul Administrative Court 201Gudan13807, and the above court rendered a judgment that partly accepted the Plaintiff’s claim to the effect that the part that did not recognize it as an additional prize is illegal since “the 4th century loss and the vertebrate salt” was recognized as a relation to official duties. Accordingly, the above judgment became final and conclusive. Accordingly, on September 2, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that “the 4th century loss and the vertebrate salt (hereinafter “the instant difference”) against the Plaintiff constituted “the 2nd,” and “the 1, 2, and the 1, and the 1, and 2 of this case collectively referred to as the “each of the instant difference”).”
The defendant shall determine the degree of the entire disability of this case, including the second disability.