A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 8, 2014, at around 03:00, the Defendant: “D” located in Cheongju-si, U.S., U.S., as an issue of the drinking value; “influence the drinking value” from the victim E (44 tax) who observed the light border; (a) was hicking the victim’s left side side by a lush; and (b) was fluoring the victim’s fluence by her hand.

Accordingly, the Franchisation of the defendant's one-way Franchis together with the franchising of the victim by her hand, and the victim's franchis at one time as a drinking.

B. A defendant has reached the victim's inner part and the number of backs once every time due to beer's disease by shouldering beer who is a dangerous object.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with F, inflicted injury on the victim by carrying dangerous things with approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against E or F;

1. Investigation report (attached to the F Summary Order), summary order, and indictment (assumptive Form);

1. A medical certificate of injury (E);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the parts of the victim E's body photograph;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the following sentencing grounds) of the Act on the Mitigation of Small Quantity was that the defendant broken the beer's disease, which is a dangerous object, and thereby, the defendant injured the victim as the beer's disease. Such an act is highly dangerous, the degree of injury of the victim is not less than that of the victim, the fact that there is a history of punishment for a large number of crimes is disadvantageous to the defendant, and that the defendant agreed with the victim, the confession of the crime in this case, and the violation of the Act, and that there is no criminal offense beyond the suspension of execution is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.