logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.11.05 2020고정611
재물손괴
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is in charge of the general affairs of the apartment center B in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, and the victim C (Nam and 57 years of age) shall be the chairperson of the above apartment group.

On February 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 00:30 on February 24, 2020, on the ground that the victim unilaterally sent the “convenor for the closure of the center for older persons due to cocoin” at the front corridor D, which is the victim’s residence; (b) caused the victim’s door-to-face by exposing the front door of the residence of the victim, and caused the victim’s door-to-face-to-face to be cut up; and (c) damaged the shock network installed on the front door of the corridor by hand to have the 120,000 won in total of the tear repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence List 22);

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is poor, and the fact that the victim did not receive a letter from the victim is unfavorable.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant committed a crime by shocking and contingently closing the senior citizens' situation, partial recovery of damaged damage, the fact that the defendant recognizes his/her crime, the fact that the defendant has difficulty in living conditions in his/her status as an elderly person, and other factors, such as character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. specified in the arguments in this case, such as

arrow