beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 2015, the Defendant: (a) the luminous day, which is a luminous company that manufactures and sells motor vehicle parts, is an employee in charge of Norway; (b) the victim E and F, who operates a company D in the mutual influent restaurant located in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and (c) the victim E and F, who operates the company D in an influent restaurant.
It shall be the same to some extent in the future.
The quality of a company that supplies tapes and net indirect arrivals can be changed to D because the internal government manages C. In this context, it is possible to change to D.
“Along with the fact that it would cause the victims to trade the goods such as the above net indirect arrival system,” the victims would die by telephone from the victim E by taking advantage of the aforementioned circumstances at the bar of the 29th of the same month.
It was demanded to pay 2,00,000 won after 3 months of full payment."
However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have the power or ability to make the victims deliver the net indirect arrivals, etc. normally to the Norway. On the other hand, even if he borrowed money from the victim E, there was no intention or ability to pay it within the agreed period.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim E as such, received 2,00,000 won from the victim E to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the Defendant on the 30th of the same month.
2. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant extended KRW 1,500,000 to the victim E by telephone to the victim E by telephone. The said money is to be repaid at the end of July.
“A false statement” was made.
However, at the time, the defendant did not have the authority or ability to allow the victims to make a transaction as provided in Paragraph 1, and even if he borrowed money from the victims E, he did not have the intent or ability to pay it normally.
Nevertheless, the defendant is guilty.